Integrated Phyto Tech for Mass Algae Culture

Distributed solar oil production would most economic when the process technology is building integrated. Individual building, whether they are large or small (in individual homes) can get bottled liquid CO 2 delivered as we do now with propane for example. The CO 2 can bleed off at normal pressure into the culture tanks. This assures that the enriched CO 2 environment is maintained for maximum metabolization by the algae. Whether the project is integrated with a single family home or a large multi-residence community development one can get the liquid CO 2 delivered to various size on-site pressure tanks. Remember that it is a penalty of centralized power plants and other industrial process that produce CO 2 and must find a way of mitigating vast quantities of GHG. They may pay for Sola Roof veggie oil producers to take their quota for sequestration. In other words we are recycling a waste product - a GHG.

Think of the culture tanks as the primary unit of biomass production. These tanks have a certain practical size and will probably be scaled up by having farms of tanks. Each tank has a certain liquid volume and a biomass loading rate - which is the % by weight of the algae. You would be able to skim off the algae at a certain rate while the "bloom" is in progress. This would be during the daylight hours. No doubt the rate of harvest would be proportionate the amount of sunlight. Now you need to expose the mass of algae in a tank to the sunlight every ten minutes. This is the time line for cell division and multiplication following sunlight exposure. The cells store radiative energy that can be metabolized later and passed on to the daughter cells. A thick layer of water containing algae will not assure adequate exposure because only algae very near the surface will get a sufficient exposure to the light. A thin faster moving water layer will do the job very well.

In our Sola Roof system we are circulating water in any case to provide climate control in the fashion that I have just described - where the water film is the absorber of the solar radiant energy that has been absorbed by the higher plants growing under the Sola Roof envelope. The roof cover is already there and paid for as is the pumping energy. So the harvest of algae is a bonus that we get by setting up the tank and culture/harvest. Even the tank itself would otherwise still be there so I don't think it should be charged as an incremental cost against the total capital cost of the algae system. If we have a certain size tank producing a know rate of harvest and therefore oil as one of the products, and we know we have to circulate the entire volume of that tank to the roof every ten minutes then we would experimentally determine the area of Sola Roof system needed for an optimum flow rate per area (and get the optimum water film thickness). This could be played with until we get the best productivity out of one tank. Then a farm of tanks would need N x more roof area in a modular design. Or a roof of a certain area would be set up with a certain number of tanks.


Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:19 AM Subject: Re: net energy/ was - plants to the rescue - CO 2 as "plant food"

I think that right now there is no problem obtaining enough CO 2 to run a CO 2 enhanced solar oil plant. The real problem is that the scale of the CO 2 sources is so large that plants smaller than a few square miles would hardly even be of interest to the sources. A mostly self sustaining small community is a pretty good idea, but you should remember that our idea of a small community is several thousand families, tens of thousands of individuals. But right, you start small and demonstrate that it works well before you commit your larger community.

Additionally, the large producers of CO 2 are going to be capturing and liquefying their CO 2 and as Mike was saying these produces will pay others to take the CO 2 off their hands and sequester it back into the biosphere somehow. There is I believe more practical progress and knowledge of how to get the CO 2 than there is about practical solutions to sequester it again. The biosphere of forests etc cannot be isolated to feed on the CO 2 and in any case the rates of sequestration by the photosynthesis of the higher plants, including trees (even so call fast growing tree plantations) are now where near to being able to metabolize the CO 2 that is coming down the pipe so to speak. Only algae can, with the benefit of closed atmosphere hydroponic cultivation, achieve a greatly enhanced rate of growth and conversion that would be in step with our rate of combustion of energy fuels.

I would like to see a revival of the "village" pattern of community development with distributed power systems, district heating and cooling (using the Blue Green solution: ambient solar and Ambient Cold Water systems for climate control in buildings), and a mix of alternate energy technologies that would supplement energy from a clean hydrocarbon cycle. If we look at the roof area of our homes and communities we can see that a very large potential for closed cycle ECOLOGICAL energy system to become our primary energy source. I have heard of a projection that states that more homes will be built in the next 20 years than have been built since the beginning of history through to today. California expects housing to expand by 40% in the next ten years. So if a fraction of this growth could be in the form of sustainable communities then we would reduce the rate of resource depletion and soft land the world economy on an ALTERNATIVE track to a sustainable future.


Original Message From: fred mcgalliard To: <ae@listproc.sjsu.edu> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:11 PM Subject: Re: net energy/ was - plants to the rescue - CO 2 as "plant food"

If I have been following this thread correctly, the plan is to use "captured CO 2" to enrich the air in a greenhouse-like setting to grow algae for the production of energy either through production of oils or direct pyrolysis.

Answer by Sola Roof Guy: Bob, the purpose of the CO 2 is not just to enhance the growth rate, but in this case to dramatically increase the proportion of oil produced, so I do not have to pyrolyze the dry algae to obtain it. For this purpose I might even consider it a pay off to burn the crop leavings from my garden and feed the CO 2 into our culture. The overall cost/benefit of this process is going to include a lot of other issues I don't feel like I have any good handle on. Given the number of different ways I can get CO 2 from the air, from aerobic digestion of compost, from combustion of any of the organic byproducts, I think that is not my first worry. Getting a high enough yield of oil per square foot of algae tank, and establishing a more or less continuous process, that is my first and biggest problem. All the rest is, I think, (as the physicists always say) just a problem of engineering. From: Bob Allen <bob.allen@atu.edu>

Sola Roof Continuous Culture of Algae

Chlorella algae manifest an altered metabolism at high CO 2 concentration in the growing media (dissolved in the sea water). In this case the lipids go from the normal level of under 10% and increase to 60% while the protein component that is normally about 60% fall to 10%. This information was developed by Arthur D. Little back in the mid 60's. I found this and allot of other data at the UN Library Headquarters in N.Y. - but I lost the file some time ago. It is time to start to pull together some information on the current state of the art.

In those days the mass culture of algae was going to "feed the world" and end the specter of mass starvation due to population growth. The great thing about the algae is that it needs no petrochemical fertilizers to grow. It can synthesize proteins by pulling N2 from the air (micro bubbles that are in the water). That is why turbulent flow is so good for rapid growth. It gives access to light, CO 2 and N2 - which is all that is needed for growth (necessary minerals are in the sea water). The entire biomass is edible or can be converted to other products. Land area is not needed - every home and community could be self sufficient in energy and organic nitrogen (that can be fed as a "green manure" to the higher plants). One of the comments at the time was that people would not eat so many algae - but the answer is to use the algae as nutrient to grow other plants. This gets us off the petrochemical dependency of "modern" agriculture on petroleum derived nitrogen fertilizers. Please let me remind everyone that today's agriculture accounts for about 16% of our petroleum consumption (tractors, fertilizer, chemicals, and refrigeration and transportation to market) not including the cooking of food (which is some countries is a big item of concern).

I would not see a problem with taking this interest to a Biomass or Bio Energy? list if anyone has a reference to one that is not completely dominated by agriculture crops like corn to ethanol etc. On the other hand I see the Sola Roof community as having a sufficiently wide area of interest to bear some discussion of this subject - especially in the light that these systems can be integrated into our building envelops as an urban energy concept rather then an agricultural concept. Indeed it is only controlled atmosphere production (with elevated CO 2 environment) that can convert solar>biomass>Bio Fuel at a rate that will pay. The agri-energy systems exist only because of huge multi-tiered subsidies. The petrochemical industry has corrupted the agricultural sector into a producer of toxic food and the largest single "industrial disaster" of modern times - and one that is in the process of devastating the environmental & ecological equilibrium of the world. If you want to "get off oil" you might want to think about what to do about our worldwide (throw GM into the mix for good measure) toxic food industry.

« November 2017 · January 2018 »

December 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    010203
04050607080910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Calendar:

  • No entries for December 2017.